Amid the considerable disarray surrounding the United States attacks on Venezuela, the seizure of leader Nicolás Maduro, and the declaration by Donald Trump that the US will “manage” the country and “reclaim the petroleum resources”, one thing is clear – these actions create a truly chilling precedent.
The United States possesses a dark record of meddling, military incursions, and control in the region, but the recent overnight operation saw its premier large-scale offensive on the continent of South America. “The preeminence of America in this region is now beyond dispute,” the President stated.
The decision to unilaterally attack another independent nation and capture its head of state – mere days after he openly looked for a diplomatic solution – has still wider repercussions. We all have reason to be worried.
Venezuelans have suffered under an oppressive, corrupt, and inept government under Mr Maduro, widely believed to have rigged the previous presidential vote. They now face profound uncertainty at best. Mr Trump has indicated that Mr Maduro’s deputy, Delcy Rodríguez would follow US instructions, and rejected conservative dissident leader and Nobel prize-winner María Corina Machado as a plausible replacement.
However, Ms Rodríguez, now the interim president, has so far adopted a posture of resistance – and other elements of the leadership-stricken government are considerably more radical.
A man who came to office promising to abandon foreign wars now says he is “not afraid of boots on the ground”. Rebranding the Department of Defense as the Department of War was a substantive signal. He does not see the world’s superpower as a global policeman; he is transforming it into a rogue state.
He believes that the America's power permits it to do as it wishes with little consequence: witness the military actions against Nigeria and Iranian installations. He promises that control of Venezuela's petroleum means this latest episode “won’t cost us a penny”.
George W. Bush initiated war in Iraq on a lie. But this action without legal basis came lacking any form of UN approval or the consent of the US Congress; key legislators received no advance notice and say they were given false information in briefings. Mr Trump aims not merely to stretch international norms, but to destroy them.
Set aside the signal this transmits to leaders in Moscow, Beijing, and beyond, and question the future path of the United States. While the raid is said to have slain 40 Venezuelans, including civilians, not a single US soldier was lost. Mr Trump’s growing sense of invincibility will surely embolden additional military gambits.
It is widely rejected the justification that this is concerning narcotics. Venezuela is only a minor conduit for cocaine; Mr Trump recently granted clemency to the ex-leader of Honduras Juan Orlando Hernández for narcotics and arms offenses. Mr Trump himself has been explicit that he is propelled by the lure of oil as well as a desire to project strength, the worldview of key officials, and the quest for a legacy as his support at home declines.
The international response, especially in Europe, has – with notable outliers – been alarmingly quiet. That’s not due to Mr Maduro’s sins, but trepidation regarding Mr Trump’s wrath. The strong reaction from UN Secretary General António Guterres was notable, but this episode underscores the waning power of international bodies.
Mr Trump’s voters who oppose foreign entanglements could still pressure him to focus on domestic issues once more – but soaring healthcare premiums, public anxiety over the economy and distracting files make foreign conflicts more appealing.
Barely 12 months into his presidential term. Other governments may live to repent if they stay silent now, given what – and who – could be next.
A seasoned gaming analyst with over a decade of experience in online casinos, specializing in slot machine mechanics and player psychology.